<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE COMPARISON TALKING POINTS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gawfer.net/2008/09/2008-presidential-candidate-comparison-talking-points/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gawfer.net/2008/09/2008-presidential-candidate-comparison-talking-points/</link>
	<description>"The Declaration of Independence acknowledges God as Creator, Lawgiver, 'Supreme Judge of the World,' and the one who providentially superintends the affairs of man. I join the Founders in personally acknowledging the importance of Almighty God's fixed moral standards for restoring the moral fabric of this nation." - John Adams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Armen</title>
		<link>http://gawfer.net/2008/09/2008-presidential-candidate-comparison-talking-points/comment-page-1/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>Armen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gawfer.net/?p=727#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>Oooo! This is a point mentioned. I like when everything in place while it is understandable to mere mortals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooo! This is a point mentioned. I like when everything in place while it is understandable to mere mortals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gawfer</title>
		<link>http://gawfer.net/2008/09/2008-presidential-candidate-comparison-talking-points/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Gawfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gawfer.net/?p=727#comment-793</guid>
		<description>Dan,
I&#039;m gonna be nice to you once, and ask your to remover your head from your butt and source NON biased references-

Obama/Biden: Last week on the Today Show, Joe Biden stated anyone making over $250,000 a year needs to step up and be patriotic by paying more taxes. Interestingly, that includes all the businesses making more that $250,000 who employs 85% of the American work force. You don’t think that will affect the workers?
Obama’s record on tax reform:

• Tax cut for 95% of all working families, not corporations. (Aug 2008) 
• Tax cut for middle class and relief to struggling homeowners. (Jul 2008) 
• Expand the Earned Income Tax Credit. (Jul 2008) 
• GovWatch: didn&#039;t vote to raise taxes 94 times; at most 54. (Jul 2008) 
• I&#039;m running against failed policy of profligate GOP spending. (May 2008) 
• I will raise CEO taxes, no doubt about it. (May 2008) 
• Under Bill Clinton, rich people didn&#039;t feel oppressed. (Apr 2008) 
• No tax increase if earning under $250K; tax cuts under $75K. (Apr 2008) 
• Raise capital gains tax for fairness, not for revenue. (Apr 2008) 
• Tax cut for seniors and those making $75,000 a year or less. (Feb 2008) 
• I&#039;m not bashful about it: wealthy will pay more taxes. (Jan 2008) 
• Stimulus package: $500 tax cut, &amp; Social Security supplement. (Jan 2008) 
• Restore progressive tax; close loopholes; relief to seniors. (Oct 2007) 
• Trillion dollar giveaway: the Paris Hilton Tax Break. (Oct 2007) 
• Reduce Bush tax cuts to pay for health care &amp; other programs. (Jun 2007) 
• Estate tax only affects the wealthiest 1/2 of 1%. (Oct 2006) 
• Specific tax relief for families making $75,000 or less now. (Jan 2006) 
• Bush tax cuts help corporations but not middle class. (Jun 2004) 
• Tax incentives to create jobs at home instead of offshore. (Jun 2004) 
• Last thing we need now is a permanent tax cut. (Jan 2008) 
• Voted YES on increasing tax rate for people earning over $1 million. (Mar 2008) 
• Voted NO on allowing AMT reduction without budget offset. (Mar 2008) 
• Voted NO on raising the Death Tax exemption to $5M from $1M. (Feb 2008) 
• Voted NO on repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax. (Mar 2007) 
• Voted NO on raising estate tax exemption to $5 million. (Mar 2007) 
• Voted NO on supporting permanence of estate tax cuts. (Aug 2006) 
• Voted NO on permanently repealing the `death tax`. (Jun 2006) 
• Voted YES on $47B for military by repealing capital gains tax cut. (Feb 2006) 
• Voted NO on retaining reduced taxes on capital gains &amp; dividends. (Feb 2006) 
• Voted NO on extending the tax cuts on capital gains and dividends. (Nov 2005) 
• Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation. (Dec 2006) 

Non-biased source:
http://www.ontheissues.org/Barack_Obama.htm#Tax_Reform</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,<br />
I&#8217;m gonna be nice to you once, and ask your to remover your head from your butt and source NON biased references-</p>
<p>Obama/Biden: Last week on the Today Show, Joe Biden stated anyone making over $250,000 a year needs to step up and be patriotic by paying more taxes. Interestingly, that includes all the businesses making more that $250,000 who employs 85% of the American work force. You don’t think that will affect the workers?<br />
Obama’s record on tax reform:</p>
<p>• Tax cut for 95% of all working families, not corporations. (Aug 2008)<br />
• Tax cut for middle class and relief to struggling homeowners. (Jul 2008)<br />
• Expand the Earned Income Tax Credit. (Jul 2008)<br />
• GovWatch: didn&#8217;t vote to raise taxes 94 times; at most 54. (Jul 2008)<br />
• I&#8217;m running against failed policy of profligate GOP spending. (May 2008)<br />
• I will raise CEO taxes, no doubt about it. (May 2008)<br />
• Under Bill Clinton, rich people didn&#8217;t feel oppressed. (Apr 2008)<br />
• No tax increase if earning under $250K; tax cuts under $75K. (Apr 2008)<br />
• Raise capital gains tax for fairness, not for revenue. (Apr 2008)<br />
• Tax cut for seniors and those making $75,000 a year or less. (Feb 2008)<br />
• I&#8217;m not bashful about it: wealthy will pay more taxes. (Jan 2008)<br />
• Stimulus package: $500 tax cut, &#038; Social Security supplement. (Jan 2008)<br />
• Restore progressive tax; close loopholes; relief to seniors. (Oct 2007)<br />
• Trillion dollar giveaway: the Paris Hilton Tax Break. (Oct 2007)<br />
• Reduce Bush tax cuts to pay for health care &#038; other programs. (Jun 2007)<br />
• Estate tax only affects the wealthiest 1/2 of 1%. (Oct 2006)<br />
• Specific tax relief for families making $75,000 or less now. (Jan 2006)<br />
• Bush tax cuts help corporations but not middle class. (Jun 2004)<br />
• Tax incentives to create jobs at home instead of offshore. (Jun 2004)<br />
• Last thing we need now is a permanent tax cut. (Jan 2008)<br />
• Voted YES on increasing tax rate for people earning over $1 million. (Mar 2008)<br />
• Voted NO on allowing AMT reduction without budget offset. (Mar 2008)<br />
• Voted NO on raising the Death Tax exemption to $5M from $1M. (Feb 2008)<br />
• Voted NO on repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax. (Mar 2007)<br />
• Voted NO on raising estate tax exemption to $5 million. (Mar 2007)<br />
• Voted NO on supporting permanence of estate tax cuts. (Aug 2006)<br />
• Voted NO on permanently repealing the `death tax`. (Jun 2006)<br />
• Voted YES on $47B for military by repealing capital gains tax cut. (Feb 2006)<br />
• Voted NO on retaining reduced taxes on capital gains &#038; dividends. (Feb 2006)<br />
• Voted NO on extending the tax cuts on capital gains and dividends. (Nov 2005)<br />
• Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation. (Dec 2006) </p>
<p>Non-biased source:<br />
<a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/Barack_Obama.htm#Tax_Reform" rel="nofollow">http://www.ontheissues.org/Barack_Obama.htm#Tax_Reform</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://gawfer.net/2008/09/2008-presidential-candidate-comparison-talking-points/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gawfer.net/?p=727#comment-792</guid>
		<description>The tax information is completely false.  See http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/would_obama_tax_my_profits_if_i.html.

Much of the top is false.  Some is speculation, not fact.  See http://www.ontheissues.org/  for each candidates&#039; positions.  Use your brains, people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tax information is completely false.  See <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/would_obama_tax_my_profits_if_i.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/would_obama_tax_my_profits_if_i.html</a>.</p>
<p>Much of the top is false.  Some is speculation, not fact.  See <a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ontheissues.org/</a>  for each candidates&#8217; positions.  Use your brains, people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gawfer</title>
		<link>http://gawfer.net/2008/09/2008-presidential-candidate-comparison-talking-points/comment-page-1/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Gawfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gawfer.net/?p=727#comment-744</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, the links provided are also from CNN in this &#039;chain email&#039; and are substantiated by facts while the source provided by Rob is no longer available.

While you describe the top half as being Moral issues, (and I&#039;d like to applaud you for recognizing that there is indeed moral and immoral behavior), one must recognize those too are historical facts about each candidates’ history, record and experience.

Finally, I find it quite entertaining that any news source that drifts away from the extreme left is considered ‘FAUX’ by Obamaphiles.

So, to avoid Obamageden, one must certainly for McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, the links provided are also from CNN in this &#8216;chain email&#8217; and are substantiated by facts while the source provided by Rob is no longer available.</p>
<p>While you describe the top half as being Moral issues, (and I&#8217;d like to applaud you for recognizing that there is indeed moral and immoral behavior), one must recognize those too are historical facts about each candidates’ history, record and experience.</p>
<p>Finally, I find it quite entertaining that any news source that drifts away from the extreme left is considered ‘FAUX’ by Obamaphiles.</p>
<p>So, to avoid Obamageden, one must certainly for McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://gawfer.net/2008/09/2008-presidential-candidate-comparison-talking-points/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gawfer.net/?p=727#comment-743</guid>
		<description>That is a chain email with the bottom half having all the actual facts wrong.  People get sucked into believing lies.  The top half are moral issues that are most of the time just differences in political party views.  Faux News isn&#039;t a real site with unbiased views and the other links are either invalid or go to multi-stories where if you really check into it prove that the chain email is wrong.

 Obama and McCain Tax Proposals

According to a new analysis by the Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution, Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain are both proposing tax plans that would result in cuts for most American families. Obama&#039;s plan gives the biggest cuts to those who make the least, while McCain would give the largest cuts to the very wealthy. For the approximately 147,000 families that make up the top 0.1 percent of the income scale, the difference between the two plans is stark. While McCain offers a $269,364 tax cut, Obama would raise their taxes, on average, by $701,885 - a difference of nearly $1 million.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...060900950.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a chain email with the bottom half having all the actual facts wrong.  People get sucked into believing lies.  The top half are moral issues that are most of the time just differences in political party views.  Faux News isn&#8217;t a real site with unbiased views and the other links are either invalid or go to multi-stories where if you really check into it prove that the chain email is wrong.</p>
<p> Obama and McCain Tax Proposals</p>
<p>According to a new analysis by the Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution, Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain are both proposing tax plans that would result in cuts for most American families. Obama&#8217;s plan gives the biggest cuts to those who make the least, while McCain would give the largest cuts to the very wealthy. For the approximately 147,000 families that make up the top 0.1 percent of the income scale, the difference between the two plans is stark. While McCain offers a $269,364 tax cut, Obama would raise their taxes, on average, by $701,885 &#8211; a difference of nearly $1 million.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...060900950.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn&#8230;060900950.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
